Video Analysis

 Classroom Tour

Blog Post #5 (Connections)

What to Look for in a Classroom By Alex Kohn

Here are some key points I noticed.

Student-Centered Learning: Kohn advocates for classrooms that prioritize student-centered learning. He believes that students should have a say in their education and that their interests and curiosities should drive the learning process.

Intrinsic Motivation: The book emphasizes the importance of fostering intrinsic motivation rather than relying on external rewards and punishments. Kohn argues that true learning happens when students are genuinely interested and engaged, not when they are motivated by grades or other extrinsic factors.

Collaborative Learning: Kohn supports collaborative learning environments where students work together and learn from each other. He believes that cooperation, rather than competition, should be the norm in classrooms.

Critical Thinking: The book stresses the importance of developing critical thinking skills. Kohn argues that education should go beyond rote memorization and encourage students to think deeply, ask questions, and challenge assumptions.

Teacher's Role: Kohn views the teacher’s role as a facilitator and guide rather than an authoritarian figure. He believes that teachers should create a supportive environment that encourages exploration and risk-taking.

Assessment Practices: The book critiques traditional assessment practices, such as standardized testing, and advocates for more meaningful and holistic forms of assessment that truly reflect student learning and growth.

Classroom Environment: Kohn highlights the significance of a positive and nurturing classroom environment. He believes that classrooms should be places where students feel safe, respected, and valued.

Overall, Alfie Kohn's "What to Look for in a Classroom" calls for a shift away from traditional, authoritarian teaching methods towards more progressive, student-centered approaches that prioritize intrinsic motivation, collaboration, and critical thinking. I believe Kohn feels pretty strongly about creating a more engaging and supportive learning environment. He really believes in the power of student-centered approaches and wants to see education that inspires curiosity and critical thinking. It seems like he’s all about fostering a love for learning rather than just focusing on grades or tests. What do you think about his ideas?

Blog Post #4 (Connections)

Other People's Children: The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children 

By Lisa Delpit

These are some Key points I noticed when reading this.

Cultural Conflicts in Education: Delpit discusses how cultural differences between teachers and students can lead to misunderstandings and miscommunications. She emphasizes that many teachers, often from middle-class backgrounds, may not fully understand the cultural contexts of their students, particularly those from marginalized communities.

Power Dynamics: The book delves into the power dynamics present in educational settings. Delpit argues that traditional pedagogical approaches often silence the voices of students of color and their communities. She calls for a more inclusive approach that recognizes and values the cultural capital that these students bring to the classroom.

The Need for Explicit Instruction: Delpit highlights the importance of explicit instruction in teaching standard academic skills. She suggests that while progressive, student-centered approaches have their merits, they may not always serve the needs of all students, particularly those who are not familiar with the implicit rules of the dominant culture.

Empowering Teachers and Students: Delpit advocates for empowering both teachers and students by fostering open dialogues about race, culture, and power in education. She encourages teachers to listen to the voices of their students and their communities and to adapt their teaching methods to be more culturally responsive.

Practical Strategies: The book provides practical strategies for teachers to bridge cultural gaps and create more equitable and effective learning environments. These include building strong relationships with students, incorporating culturally relevant materials, and being mindful of the diverse ways that students learn.

Overall, Lisa Delpit's "Other People's Children" calls for a more equitable and culturally responsive approach to education that acknowledges and addresses the power imbalances and cultural differences in the classroom. I believe  Delpit feels quite passionate about the need for change in education. She emphasizes the importance of recognizing cultural differences and the power dynamics at play in classrooms. Her advocacy for more inclusive practices shows that she genuinely cares about empowering both students and teachers. Overall, she seems to believe that addressing these issues is crucial for creating a more equitable educational system. 

Blog Post #3 (Connections)

The Academic and Social Value of Ethnic Studies, A Research Review

By Christine E. Sleeter

Here are some key points I noticed in this reading.

Academic Benefits: Sleeter's review highlights that ethnic studies programs can significantly improve academic outcomes for students. These programs help increase student engagement, attendance, and academic achievement, especially among students of color. By providing a curriculum that reflects their own histories and cultures, ethnic studies help students feel more connected and invested in their education.

Social and Emotional Benefits: The review also discusses the positive social and emotional impacts of ethnic studies. These programs promote a greater understanding and appreciation of different cultures, which can reduce racial prejudice and stereotypes. Students who participate in ethnic studies often develop a stronger sense of identity and self-worth, as well as improved intergroup relations.

Critical Thinking and Civic Engagement: Ethnic studies encourage critical thinking by challenging students to analyze and question historical narratives and societal structures. This critical approach not only enhances students' analytical skills but also fosters a sense of civic responsibility and activism. Students are more likely to become engaged citizens who advocate for social justice and equity.

Overall, Christine E. Sleeter's research review makes a strong case for the inclusion of ethnic studies in educational curricula, demonstrating that these programs offer significant academic, social, and civic benefits for students. Sleeter's stance on ethnic studies is clear and supportive. She presents a strong argument in favor of these programs, emphasizing their numerous benefits. Sleeter believes that ethnic studies are crucial for fostering academic success, social and emotional development, and critical thinking skills among students. She views ethnic studies as a powerful tool to enhance educational equity and to create a more inclusive and just society. By highlighting the positive outcomes associated with ethnic studies, Sleeter advocates for their widespread implementation in schools, stressing that they are not only beneficial but necessary for a well-rounded and effective education.

Blog Post #2 (Connections)

Standardized Testing: Khan argues that the emphasis on standardized testing stifles creativity and critical thinking. It forces teachers to teach to the test rather than focusing on deeper learning.

One-Size-Fits-All Approach: The traditional classroom model, where one teacher lectures to many students, does not cater to individual learning paces and styles. Some students are left behind, while others are not sufficiently challenged.

Fixed Time and Variable Learning: In the current system, all students are expected to learn at the same pace within a fixed time frame. This leads to gaps in understanding, as students who don't grasp a concept are forced to move on to the next topic.

Lack of Real-World Relevance: Khan criticizes the curriculum for being disconnected from real-world applications. Students often fail to see the relevance of what they're learning, which diminishes their motivation.

 Inefficient Use of Technology: Although technology has the potential to transform education, it is often used in limited and ineffective ways in traditional classrooms.

Khan advocates for a more personalized, mastery-based approach to education, where students can learn at their own pace and teachers can focus on facilitating rather than lecturing. He believes that this model can better prepare students for the challenges of the future.